🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."