🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.